Introduction to Biological Psychology
Chapter 1. Introduction to biological psychology
🧭 Overview
🧠 One-sentence thesis
Biological psychology investigates how physical processes in the brain and nervous system generate our minds, behavior, and sense of self, and this field has evolved from ancient debates about mind-body relationships to modern materialist approaches that use sophisticated techniques to study neural mechanisms underlying behavior.
📌 Key points (3–5)
- Historical shift: Understanding moved from heart-centered (Aristotle) to brain-centered (Hippocrates, Galen) explanations, and from dualism (Descartes) to materialism (contemporary view that mind arises from physical brain processes).
- Methodological evolution: Techniques progressed from crude permanent lesions to modern methods that can record and temporarily modulate specific neural populations while observing behavior.
- Behavioral vs. cognitive approaches: Mid-20th century behaviorists (Watson, Skinner) rejected internal mental states, but evidence like sensory preconditioning forced recognition that learning involves internal cognitive structures.
- Common confusion: Behaviorally silent learning shows that learning ≠ immediate behavior change; animals can form associations (e.g., light-tone pairing) that only affect behavior later, proving internal representations exist.
- Tinbergen's four questions: Biological psychology asks about proximate causes (mechanisms and development within a lifetime) and ultimate causes (evolutionary history and adaptive function).
🏛️ Historical foundations of mind-brain understanding
❤️ Heart vs. brain debate in ancient Greece
- Aristotle's view (~350 BCE): The heart was the seat of mind and thought; the brain merely cooled blood.
- Why this seemed plausible: In threatening situations, people consciously feel heart changes (racing pulse) but not brain activity changes.
- Linguistic legacy: Heart-centered thinking persists in language—"heartfelt" apologies, heart emojis for love, Shakespeare's "false heart."
Modern research shows a grain of truth: pressure receptors in arteries activate with each heartbeat and can influence how the brain processes threat-related stimuli.
🧠 Brain-centered view emerges
- Hippocrates and Plato (4th century BCE): Argued the brain connects physically via nerves to sense organs and muscles, making it the likely seat of mind.
- Galen (2nd century CE):
- Treated gladiator injuries; observed that head trauma causes immediate unconsciousness.
- Performed experiments: cutting the laryngeal nerve stopped vocalization, proving specific nerve functions.
- Rejected lungs as thought center; saw them as bellows driving air through the larynx.
🌍 Islamic Golden Age contributions
- Ibn Sina (Avicenna, 980 CE):
- Refined Galen's ideas with detailed stroke descriptions.
- Correctly identified strokes as caused by blockages or bursts in brain blood circulation.
- Used pulse rate changes to identify emotionally significant people when treating "love disorder" (similar to severe depression).
- Documented opium's pain-relief properties and serious side effects (breathing suppression, addiction).
Don't confuse: These early scholars lacked modern neuroscience but made crucial observations linking brain damage to specific behavioral changes.
🔄 Descartes and the dualism problem
🤔 Cartesian dualism
- René Descartes (1637): Discourse on Method argued for mind-body separation.
- Famous conclusion: "Cogito, ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am)—the only certainty is that conscious awareness proves one's existence.
Dualism: The philosophical position that mind and body are fundamentally different kinds of entities.
⚙️ Attempted mechanism for interaction
- Descartes' proposal (De homine, 1633):
- Mind and body interact through the pineal gland (the only unpaired brain structure).
- "Animal spirits" (fluids in brain ventricles) move to muscles via a pneumatic mechanism.
- The pineal acts as a valve between mind and brain.
- Reality: The pineal gland is an endocrine gland regulating sleep patterns, not a mind-body interface.
🔥 Reflex mechanisms
- Descartes described simple reflexes (e.g., withdrawing a foot from fire) as occurring via the spinal cord without involving the pineal gland.
- Though many details were wrong, Descartes was a materialist about the body—he viewed it as a mechanism.
Example: His drawing shows fire stimulating the foot, pulling a "thread" that opens a pore, allowing animal spirits to flow and activate muscles for withdrawal—like pulling a cord to ring a bell.
⚡ From fluid to electrical mechanisms
🔋 Discovery of electrical nerve conduction
- Stephen Hales (1733): First suggested nerve transmission might be electrical, not fluid-based (controversial at the time).
- Luigi Galvani (1791):
- Demonstrated electrical stimulation of a frog's sciatic nerve produces muscle contractions.
- Announced he had shown "the electric nature of animal spirits."
- Hermann von Helmholtz (1850s):
- Measured nerve conduction speed in frog: ~30 meters/second.
- Disproved earlier speculation that nerve impulses traveled at or faster than light speed.
🧩 Brain localization debates
- Franz Gall & Johann Spurzheim (early 1800s):
- Proposed different cognitive functions localize to specific cortical areas.
- Created phrenology: examining skull shape to assess individual abilities.
- Initially popular but later discredited.
- The two had a spectacular falling-out over plagiarism accusations.
🗣️ Evidence for localization
- Paul Broca (1860s): Correlated language loss with damage to specific brain areas (only visible through post-death dissection).
- Cerebral lateralization: Broca noted language loss almost always involved left cortex lesions, often with right-side limb weakness.
- Marc Dax made similar observations in the 1830s but published posthumously in 1865.
- Once thought uniquely human, lateralization is now known to be widespread in vertebrates with ancient evolutionary origins.
Don't confuse: Early lesion studies showed an area was necessary for a function but couldn't prove it was the only important area. Modern fMRI reveals multiple active areas during tasks.
🐀 Behaviorism and the positivist revolution
📊 Positivist foundations
- Auguste Compte: Argued social sciences should adopt physical science methods—rely solely on empirical observation, not introspection.
- Application to psychology: Record observable behavior in laboratory or field; avoid unobservable mental states.
🔬 Watson's radical behaviorism
John Watson (1913): "Psychology, as the behaviorist views it, is a purely objective, experimental branch of natural science which needs introspection as little as do the sciences of chemistry and physics."
- Emphasized simple stimulus-response relationships.
- Resisted considering complex cognitive processes (risked returning to mind-body dualism).
Little Albert experiment (1920):
- Conditioned 9-month-old Albert B. to fear a white rat.
- Method: Paired rat presentation with loud, unexpected sound (hammer hitting steel bar).
- Result: After several pairings, Albert cried when shown the rat; fear generalized to rabbits.
- Ethical note: Would not be approved under modern psychological ethics codes.
| Element | Role in conditioning |
|---|---|
| White rat (initially neutral) | Conditioned stimulus |
| Loud sound (naturally aversive) | Unconditioned stimulus |
| Fear response | Conditioned response |
🧪 Pavlovian conditioning origins
- Ivan Pavlov: Nobel Prize-winning Russian physiologist.
- Used dogs; measured salivation to meat presentation.
- Paired ticking metronome (not a bell, as commonly stated) with meat.
- Eventually metronome alone elicited salivation.
- Historical note: The phenomenon was already known; Magendie described similar observations in humans in 1836.
🚫 Skinner's extreme position
Burrhus Skinner (The Behaviour of Organisms, 1938): Argued cognitive or physiological explanations are unnecessary.
"The simplest contingencies involve at least three terms—stimulus, response, and reinforcer... when all relevant variables are thus taken into account, there is no need to appeal to an inner apparatus, whether mental, physiological, or conceptual."
Donald Hebb's counter-argument (The Organisation of Behavior, 1949):
- Wrote "in profound disagreement" with Skinner's program.
- Argued for close relationship between psychology and physiology.
- Proposed learning involves convergence of information about two events on a single nerve cell, strengthening connections.
- Remembered as: "Cells that fire together, wire together" (Carla Schatz's mnemonic).
- Led to modern understanding of long-term potentiation (LTP) as a model for learning and memory mechanisms.
Don't confuse: Behaviorism rejected internal states entirely; cognitive approaches recognize internal representations are necessary to explain behavior.
🦆 European ethology and field studies
🐦 Lorenz and Tinbergen's approach
- Konrad Lorenz & Nikolaas Tinbergen: Emphasized detailed study of animal behavior, often in field settings rather than laboratories.
Imprinting experiment (Lorenz):
- Divided newly-hatched greylag geese into two groups.
- One group exposed to mother goose, other to Lorenz himself.
- After several days, mixed goslings together.
- Result: When Lorenz and mother walked in different directions, goslings divided based on original exposure.
Imprinting: Learning that occurs early in life but continues to influence behavior into adulthood (now used more broadly than original bird-specific definition).
🔍 Tinbergen's field experiments
- Began career in Holland studying how insects use landmarks to locate burrows.
- Held as hostage during WWII; survived and moved to Oxford in late 1940s.
- Like Watson and Skinner, interested in explaining behavior in its own terms rather than exploring underlying brain mechanisms (positivist approach).
On animal emotions (The Study of Instinct, 1951):
"Because subjective phenomena cannot be observed objectively in animals, it is idle to claim or deny their existence."
🧠 The cognitive revolution in animal learning
🔄 Sensory preconditioning reveals hidden learning
Tony Dickinson (Contemporary Animal Learning Theory, 1980): Used sensory preconditioning to demonstrate behaviorally silent learning.
Standard Pavlovian procedure:
- Rats trained to press bar for sweetened food pellets.
- Light paired with mild foot shock (several pairings).
- Test: Light alone → rats freeze and pause bar-pressing briefly.
Sensory preconditioning modification:
- Pre-exposure phase: Light paired with tone (nothing happens; rats ignore it; no behavior change).
- Conditioning phase: Light paired with shock (as above).
- Test: Tone alone → rats freeze and pause, despite never experiencing tone-shock pairing.
| Phase | Standard procedure | Sensory preconditioning |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-exposure | None | Light + Tone (no consequence) |
| Conditioning | Light + Shock | Light + Shock |
| Test stimulus | Light | Tone |
| Result | Freezing | Freezing (despite no tone-shock pairing) |
💡 Implications for cognitive structures
Dickinson's conclusion:
"Sensory preconditioning is but one of many examples of behaviourally silent learning... Something must change during learning and I shall argue that this change is best characterised as a modification of some internal structure."
- Learning does not require overt behavioral change.
- Internal cognitive structures must exist to store associations.
- In 1980, Dickinson questioned whether we could identify the neurophysiological substrate; by the 2020s, modern techniques can identify specific neuronal ensembles supporting learning.
Modern example (Koya et al., 2020):
- Mice learned clicks predict sucrose availability.
- Genetically modified mice allowed researchers to make activated neurons glow green.
- Small, stable groups of neurons ("neuronal ensembles") activated consistently across days.
- Disrupting these cells' activity impaired learned approach behavior.
Don't confuse: Absence of immediate behavior change ≠ absence of learning. Internal representations can form without observable responses.
🐵 Primate cognition and social complexity
🌳 Field studies reveal cognitive sophistication
Jane Goodall (early 1960s):
- Studied chimpanzees at Gombe Stream, Tanzania.
- Gathered evidence of rich social/emotional lives and tool use.
- Revolutionized primate behavior studies.
- Controversially gave chimpanzees names rather than numbers (colleagues wanted "objective" numbering).
Alison Jolly (1960s):
- Studied lemur behavior in Madagascar.
- Argued major driver of primate cognitive evolution was complex demands of living in long-lasting social groups.
🗣️ Social knowledge in baboon calls
Cheney & Seyfarth study: Female chacma baboons use "reconciliatory grunts" after aggressive encounters to signal peaceful conclusion.
Playback experiment:
- Played grunt to female who had just groomed another female → behaved as if call directed at someone else.
- Played grunt to female who had recently fought with that same female → behaved as if call directed at her.
Interpretation: Baboons interpret calls based on prior knowledge of social relationships and recent interactions—evidence of sophisticated social cognition.
🐘 Broader implications
- Field studies of other long-lived mammals (elephants, dolphins) suggest complex social networks and sophisticated cognitive abilities.
- Social complexity may drive cognitive evolution across multiple mammal lineages.
🎯 Tinbergen's four questions framework
📋 Two levels of causation
Proximate causes (within individual's lifetime):
- Mechanisms: Underlying causes of behavior changes (brain mechanisms, hormonal changes).
- Development: How behavior changes as individual matures.
Ultimate causes (evolutionary timescale): 3. Phylogeny: Evolutionary relationships between behavior patterns in different species. 4. Adaptive function: Advantages of particular behaviors in natural selection context.
🐦 Example: Why do male chaffinches sing in spring?
Causes and mechanisms (proximate):
- Day length increases in spring.
- Testosterone secretion increases (demonstrated experimentally in canaries by Nottebohm).
- Testosterone produces bill darkening and singing behavior.
- Brain changes occur: new neurons form in song-related areas (surprising discovery—challenged consensus that mature vertebrate brains never add neurons).
Development (proximate):
- Chaffinch song has species-typical structure: several short trills followed by characteristic terminal flourish.
- Song is recognizable but has unexpected individual complexity.
- (Excerpt ends before completing developmental explanation.)
Don't confuse: Proximate questions ask "how does it work now?" while ultimate questions ask "why did this evolve?" Both are valid and complementary approaches.
🔬 Contemporary materialist consensus
🧩 Two key features of modern biological psychology
-
Universal materialism: Almost all contemporary psychologists and neuroscientists accept that behavior complexity, including consciousness, results from physical mechanisms in the nervous system.
-
Legitimacy of subjective phenomena: After mid-20th century hiatus, emotion and consciousness are no longer "off limits" for scientific study.
🎯 Modern challenge
Understanding how the nervous system:
- Builds internal representations of the external world
- Uses these representations
- Attaches emotional weight to them
Historical trajectory: From ancient heart-brain debates → Cartesian dualism → behaviorist rejection of internal states → cognitive revolution recognizing internal representations → modern neuroscience identifying specific neural mechanisms.