Reclamations Following a History of Exclusion
Reclamations Following a History of Exclusion
🧭 Overview
🧠 One-sentence thesis
Renaissance and early modern scholarship is increasingly reclaiming the presence and significance of race and Black lives in English history, challenging a long tradition of exclusion and misrepresentation.
📌 Key points (3–5)
- The reclamation movement: scholars, institutions, and public events are bringing attention to race in Renaissance and early modern studies after a history of marginalization.
- Key scholarly contributions: recent books and archives document Black Tudor society, race in early modern England, and Black lives in English archives from 1550–1677.
- Shift from description to judgment: English travel narratives transformed "blackness" from a neutral skin-color descriptor into a racist judgment tied to assumptions of barbarity.
- Common confusion: early theories wrongly attributed skin color solely to climate; travelers like John Pory concluded it must be hereditary when climate alone couldn't explain variations.
- Fabrication and stereotype: many English travel narratives were extensively invented, projecting fears and stereotypes (e.g., "savage killers," importing Asian tigers into African descriptions) onto peoples they never actually encountered.
📚 The scholarly reclamation effort
📚 Institutional and public engagement
- The Globe Theatre and University of Sussex held a "Shakespeare and Race" event in August 2018.
- Ayanna Thompson convened a "Race Before Race" symposium in January 2019 at the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
- A sequel symposium, "Race and Periodization," was co-sponsored by the Center and the Folger Shakespeare Library in September 2019.
- Twitter conversations (#RaceB4Race) extended the scholarly dialogue beyond academic venues.
- These efforts demonstrate the "outsider status of critical race studies approaches to Renaissance scholarship broadly and to Shakespeare studies in particular" is being challenged.
📖 Key scholarly works
The excerpt lists several important contributions to documenting race and Black presence in early modern England:
| Author(s) | Title | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Miranda Kaufmann | Black Tudors: The Untold Story | Black lives in Tudor England |
| Onyeka Nubia | England's Other Countrymen: Black Tudor Society | Black Tudor society |
| Ania Loomba & Jonathan Burton | Race in Early Modern England: A Documentary Companion | Documentary evidence of race |
| Imtiaz Habib | Black Lives in the English Archives, 1550-1677: Imprints of the Invisible | Archival traces of Black lives |
| Susheila Nasta & Mark U. Stein (eds.) | The Cambridge History of Black and Asian British Writing | Black and Asian British writing history |
- These works recover "imprints of the invisible"—evidence of Black presence that has been overlooked or excluded.
- The scholarship addresses both Tudor and early modern periods (roughly 1500–1677).
🗺️ English travel narratives and fabrication
🗺️ The Cape of Good Hope as contact point
- To sail between England and Asia, ships typically required a resupply break at the Cape of Good Hope (southwest coast of Africa).
- Since the 1590s, these stops exposed English sailors and traders to native peoples and Dutch East India Company settlers.
- English people at home had "significant interest in reading their travel narratives."
🎭 Extensive fabrication in travel accounts
Many travel narratives "were extensively fabricated."
Example: Thomas Stevens' letter in Richard Hakluyt's The Principal Navigations
- Stevens wrote from "no more than five miles from the Cape" that the land was "so full of Tigers, and people that are savage, and killers of all strangers."
- Linda E. Merians notes Stevens "never set foot on land at the Cape."
- He "reports far beyond what he could possibly have witnessed."
- He "imagines barbarous peoples" and "imports tigers (native not to Africa but to Asia)."
Why this matters:
- Travelers' expectations were "so set" that they projected stereotypes onto peoples they never encountered.
- These fabrications shaped English perceptions of African peoples at home.
🖊️ Pattern of praise and dismissal
- English narratives about the Cape throughout the seventeenth century "tend to praise themselves and the landscape of the Cape while dismissing and denigrating the peoples."
- The narratives elevate English travelers and African geography while dehumanizing African peoples.
🔄 Transformation of "blackness" from description to judgment
🔄 The shift traced by Merians
Linda E. Merians traces a critical transformation in how English writers used the term "blackness":
Before the shift:
- Blackness was "a descriptive of skin color, generally without associating the people's color with the travelers' assumptions about their morals and culture."
- It functioned as a neutral physical observation.
After the shift:
- Blackness became "a racist judgment where the description of blackness was tied to a judgment of barbarity."
- Skin color became conflated with moral and cultural inferiority.
Don't confuse:
- The term "blackness" itself didn't change, but its meaning and associations transformed from neutral description to racist judgment.
- This shift reflects how language can encode and reinforce prejudice over time.
🌍 Widespread English perceptions
- The beliefs about African peoples "reinforce and are reinforced by widespread English perceptions of blackness as signaling immorality."
- Matthieu A. Chapman writes that "most scholars [...] today [believe] that the early modern English placed blacks at one of two extremes: either as objects to be feared and loathed or as objects of exoticism and wonder."
- Both extremes dehumanize: one through fear and hatred, the other through objectification and othering.
🌡️ Theories of skin color and their contradictions
🌡️ The climate theory challenged
- One popular theory held that hot climate caused dark skin.
- The peoples of the Cape provided "a counter-example to one popular theory of skin color."
John Pory's observation (in Leo Africanus's The History and Description of Africa):
- "It could not be a hot climate that made the people of the Cape so dark skinned, as there are other even hotter climates where the people are much lighter skinned."
- Pory concludes that "skin color must be hereditary."
Why this matters:
- The climate theory was empirically inadequate—it couldn't explain observed variations.
- The shift to hereditary explanations laid groundwork for later racial categorizations.
- Don't confuse: Pory's conclusion was based on observing inconsistencies in the climate theory, not on understanding genetics (which didn't exist as a science at the time).
🧬 From environment to inheritance
- The move from environmental (climate) to hereditary explanations represents an important conceptual shift.
- Hereditary explanations could more easily support fixed racial categories and hierarchies.
- Example: If climate determines skin color, moving to a different climate might change it; if heredity determines it, the characteristic becomes fixed and inheritable, supporting ideas of permanent racial difference.